InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.40
(
0.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.59
(
-0.24%
)
Bitcoin
65,479.96
(
0.52%
)
Post# of 35633
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

rocketeer357

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 32
Posts 3541
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/02/2004

rocketeer357

Re: Jagman post# 9621

Wednesday, 04/04/2007 5:36:19 AM

Wednesday, April 04, 2007 5:36:19 AM

Post# of 35633
Yup. The worst case scenario: no contract, no gas production, the company footing the bill for the whole debacle. No new word of another landfill. No indication of why the whole proposal went pear-shaped.
I had high hopes for this end of the biz- the time is certainly ripe for clean energy/carbon credits and all the outstanding PR that would have come from a producing landfill at Chastang.
2 fat but non-producing eggs in a basket is a helluva lot more attractive than one.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up