InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 57
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/20/2007

Re: None

Tuesday, 04/03/2007 8:26:38 PM

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:26:38 PM

Post# of 18807
Another one of my Long and boring posts (to some)

Avalanchecustoms (post 2945) came on board and noted that the NASCAR brand is in no way affiliated with RRGI. This simple observation is very true. Conversely, RRGI has pumped their product in a manner that leads laymen to believe that NASCAR endorses it in the attempt to lend credibility. Paying famous NASCAR personalities for public appearances and talking about NASCAR in the third person easily accomplished this goal.

The truth about NASCAR is that it is not about to have the NASCAR brand tarnished by awarding amateur contest winners a chance to do squat. And all of those purported contestants who are most likely just friends of GA Jr. in the ASA circuit know the value of that association as it relates to NASCAR.

Clue number one as it relates to the integrity of RRGI is that there is no $750,000.00 first prize. The prize is a hoax. It does not appear in the financial statements anywhere and someone has to be a total rube to believe that a contract with the famed GA Jr. race team is worth more than the paper it is written on. Perhaps there is immense tangible value to be had in the national recognition that Reality Racing will bring to the winner – sure there is.

Second clue: They are now editing all the video from the “National” contestant searches. That’s nice. Did they find a time machine to go back and film this with the HD camera equipment they admittedly did not have at the time but are required to have for airing on Spike? What a neat trick that is.

Third Clue: There are several individuals who post in this forum and continually attack anyone who provides credible information or raises legitimate logical questions regarding RRGI. A viable company would remove the doubt cast upon it by all the speculation if it were able to. RRGI has repeatedly looked the other way while maintaining the need for some magical secrecy formula – an apparent big secret more coveted than the formula for Coke-a-Cola.

I have not posted here to attempt to bash RRGI. I have participated here in the quest for the truth about this company. If only one person has been influenced by the logical and rational questions that have been raised and elected to invest elsewhere, then good for them. To date, I have expended several thousand dollars of my own money to have RRGI looked into rather deeply. I have not liked what I have seen and I have stated facts as I know them to be. Some of you will choose to believe what I have stated, while others will not. That is the prerogative of each individual within this forum and in no way should a stated personal opinion or questioning of RRGI merit personal attacks, but ridicule is the only tool that some of the insiders who post here have in their portfolio.

When I was challenged as to not having the contact and cell numbers of the inside players at RRGI, I posted four of the ten digits for two contact numbers. FATDOG & Sharky quickly requested that the post be removed. Why? Because they know I trumped their hand and was not bluffing. I posted a tad bit of SEC data on 144 shares sold off and even gave three dates and amounts sold off. I once again stood by the validity of the data I possess by posting a strong wager – Once again, those who challenged my information backed down but continue with personal attacks.

Al was to acquire the pro-forma financials until he found out that I could see through them as a way to clearly judge RRGI’s performance and stability of being a viable entity and not a pinky scam. No matter what these statements would show, RRGI would be in a “gotcha” situation and I can assure everyone that they will not be released due to the contradictory data that would be contained within them as there is not way that RRGI could be made to look good – unless of course a $60k Pace car is a major key toward RRGI success. Nonetheless, there cannot be a single investor in RRGI who is happy about a stock that has done nothing but tank since it split and has yet to meet any of its obligations to shareholders.

Will RRGI every produce something on a 70mph track beyond mediocrity? I seriously doubt it. No legitimate company that I can recall has ever suffered the unforeseen circumstances that have supposedly victimized the management team of RRGI, only to come back to perform like a rock star.

And the clue of clues: The insiders would not be short selling today and last quarter what would be worth far more in the near future if there was any confidence level in their own ability to perform.

Sincere Regards

Stan


PS: Bagfull – stock scams are never quick and rapid (post 2978)– show us one in the past decade that was ever less than a year old. FATDOG: If it helps you sleep tonight, let me leave you with one thought – I shower naked!