Posted by: jack of stocks In reply to: Divine Madcat who wrote msg# 76341 Date:3/31/2007 8:02:46 PM Post #of 76343
Divine, Correct Cyberkey defaulted on the contract with SQUM and Sequiam is still in business. That is a major issue as the CKYS investors had the feeling that there was some relationship between the two companies and Cyberkey was the one controlling the cards.
Obviously Sequiam can survive without Cyberkey. As Cyberkey was using Sequiam's products for advertising and promotion why do you feel Sequiam should not be discussed on this board?
The manufacturer of the products is still in business as the reseller that was relabeling is out. As I said last fall, if you feel good about Cyberkey's products then you should diversify and be invested in Sequiam. If so, then in my opinion the investment would not be a total loss
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.