InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1560
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2006

Re: dyna post# 11263

Thursday, 03/29/2007 8:24:45 PM

Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:24:45 PM

Post# of 35337
It would be reflected in the future statements.

That's right, and that future statement is due tomorrow.
No need to redo the old ones. What I meant by re-doing a statement is simply that the accounting firm might have already made preparations to go with a set of figures to press prior to the March 16, 2007 date that would need to be changed prior to the post March 16, 2007 release. Since they would have to arrive at those amounts based upon court results and that the court results changed while they were working on the amounts. Since the amounts are material to the financials, I thought they might be inclined to revise the report that they were about to issue. That could cause a delay in the issue date.

On your question of what the court decision means, I agree that it is difficult to ascertain from the legal mumble jumble of words that they chose. I looked to the SEC 8K from the company for the plain English version. Check that one, here is a link.

http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/showFilingOutline.go?symbol=TOVC&name=TORVEC%20INC:%208-K&a...

As far as the private e-mails, I am not in that group. Must be that you aren't either. Must be that you want to be, and I don't.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.