Grifco Inc (GFCI)

[cyofish]

Knowitall, As I mentioned before I am a plaintiff in a suit against the broker. I didn't spend a penny because through my complaint with the regulatory board, they found enough cause to pursue action. Similarly, IMO there is enough cause for SEC to take action against Grifco. Just as with 75% of the cases, when SEC comes knocking the company will try their dardnest to cooperate and settle withoug admitting any wrong doing.

"but I would just love to goto any of my law professors and validate a claim via Wikipedia and say that it must have been cut and pasted from an "authoritative"

Come on, you're smarter than that. BTW, I never said wikipedia was an autohrative source. Just as I never said certain SH were "paid" to pump GFCI as you suggested (instead I said they were used by the CEO). To properly cite the law would require the code, section and paragraph.

For a law student you sure have a problem with reading comprehension. I looked at the wikipedia article and the person who posted copied the rule and posted on the site. No he didn't say Rule 10B-5 was a lesbian. Verbatim = word for word. So whether if it's written on toilet paper or in a law book, if it says exactly the same thing as the original, it carries exactly the same weight.

BTW, I don't use spellcheck on IHUB so if I occasionally misspell a word or two, I don't give a f#$%. However, As long as I feel I get the point accross, a mis-spelled word here in the context of things is 'de-minimis'.