InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 602
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/06/2006

Re: Trinityz1 post# 9531

Tuesday, 03/27/2007 12:20:55 AM

Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:20:55 AM

Post# of 14027
trinytz1, it's not Canadian law, it's an example of how some Pinks operate. IMO (and I'm sure there are others in agreement) Grifco's events parallels what took place with this company. Read the message in its entirerty before you judge. Notice it states that Sulja Bros.


Only trades in the U.S. in the pinsheet quotation system. Transfer Online is their agent.
They are a "Neveda Corporation".
They issued PR promising release of financials.
They issued false PRs and sold into the spike.


Happens all the time. Canadian law has nothing to do with it. Only reason they were involved was becaus the company is out of Canada. Also know that SEC is involved in the investigation. Again, these are all facts. Let the facts lead to the truth. I haven't specifically said this is what Grifco is doing. Not even evidence to draw a conclusion yet. ALL THIS WAS PROMPTED BY THE FACT BY HOW YOU AND YOUR BUDDIES TIRELESS EXCUSE GRIFCO'S BEHAVIOR WITH THE "IT'S A PINK FOR CRYING OUT LOUD". .

Just trying to prove a point that Pinks do in fact have Accountability!!!

Last but not least, Rule 10b-5 can be found at SEC.gov not businessjive.com. It's not found under the 'darkside.html', but you can find it under the Exchange Act of 1933.