excel, I respectfully disagree. There hasn't been a whole lot of specifics as to why my questions were "uncalled for" or even "baneful". Just generalities like they are "unanswerable".
You are probably right, many of the questions were probably "unanswerable" to shareholders. I was just seeking opinions in many cases.
There are some posters that don't appeal to me for one reason or the other. I simply, don't click their posts. I don't bother to read them if the poster has demonstrated to me that their posts are usually an unproductive use of my time. Why did so many people continue to read my posts? They had to be, because they kept attacking me. They could have simply ignored me.
That's why I thought something else was going on. I really thought some people were taking their NVEI frustrations out on me, because I asked so many questions reflecting NVEI's negative performance. Not too many people enjoy being reminded, in whatever form, of possibly making a huge financial mistake.
One way or the other, I'm really not as concerned about posting as I am seeing real evidence that a productive pattern be developed be NVEI.
However, I would like the opportunity to again converse with some trusted and repected shareholders in a civilized manner (with less "unanswerable" ?s) LOL
Matt, if you happen to read this, please consider granting me at least a three post a day probationary period on the NVEI board to demonstrate improvement.
