InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1321
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/13/2007

Re: bonded1 post# 2368

Wednesday, 03/21/2007 9:44:19 PM

Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:44:19 PM

Post# of 18807
Hello Stan, O.K. lets start with the profoma, yes there is a new revisted profoma for RRGI. I will be reciving it form the company tomarrow and I will post here. I know for sure that the 1st years earnings has changed from 8 million to 6.6 million and thats all I know for the new profoma but the original went like this 8 million 1st yr 11 milliom 2nd 15 million 3rd 20 million 4th and 25 million 5th but as I am sure you know that with all start ups this is a normal occurance to have the profoma revisted atleast once or twice in the first years of the company. In the matter of Mr Sachaffer selling off his personal company stock you will have to bring documented proof of this ie; brokarage reports, 144 fillings ect. Not to disrespect you but I am not going to take you at your word when it comes to an accusation like that. Now the matter of selling off company stock to raise capital is highly opionated and opions change from person to person and if you and I disagree on this point it is a futal effort for me to try and convince you and via versa. Finally the network deal with Fox Sports Net from 05 was a truly viable deal that was inked but the problem with Fox Sorts Net is that it is a rigonal network and the goal of RRGI has always been to be on a national network, in comes Spike. Spike was pick by RRGI for the simple reason that it fit the criteria the company was looking for ie; 1 hour show on a national network, with a fix time slot so it would make a destenation show. When i say picked by RRGI I mean just that, ESPN was also in talks with RRGI but the company past them up due to the reason the were notrious for perempting shows, so in other words one week we would be on at 7 P.M. on tuesday the next week we would be on at 10 A.M. on a friday and so on and so on.