Tommy,
Thank you very much for your response. I am aware of the 1999 lawsuits against her, as well as those in years passed. I am also aware of the FBI intervention after setting up a fraudulent company in 1999, as well.
What I don't see is a history of any Nasdaq license or an investigations license, let alone any law enforcement history or employment with an investigator. I believe virtually every state in the United States requires one to perform investigations.
I seriously doubt that posting over 100,000 posts on a public bulletin board qualifies one to be an investigator. LOL
To be called an "amateur investigator" is like to refer to a police officer as an "amateur police officer" or a doctor as an "amateur doctor."
When a person recognizes a crime may exist, one reports crime. Security guards observe and report crime. Investigators investigation situations without a bias and there is clearly a bias as she has publicly stated she has difficulty with those who hold a long position in a security.
I believe to go onto a public bulletin board, to bash a stock or bash a person, under the guise of being an investigator may be a market manipulation and it may be either intimidation of a shareholder or false information relied upon by a shareholder as being credible because of the credential presented.
Just how many investigations have you all performed together? I see in Marvin vs. Shell interrogatories, she does refer to herself as an investigator. Further, she has compared her level of expertise and ability, publicly, to mine and has made public comments about my ability to perform my work without actual knowledge of me or my abilities. I believe this to be defamation.
Nonetheless, I have left messages for her attorneys and I am certain it will be resolved with some legal intervention and her CVs that give her the expertise to determine the quality of work a licensed investigator performs.
Thanks,
Linda Bruzzone
AI
