InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 12962
Next 10
Followers 8
Posts 1070
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: ICEMAN1CO post# 8058

Wednesday, 03/21/2007 12:30:21 AM

Wednesday, March 21, 2007 12:30:21 AM

Post# of 12962
Ice: I concur. I see the recent concentration on SCE as nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from the parties presently being implicated in the alleged fraud.

SCE is a tout site, never hidden from that fact, never hidden they were paid with shares. Fact is some pumpers saw it as no big deal at the time, and even stated 5-milion shares paid to SCE was nothing compared to 700-million O/S.

Was it appropriate for SCE to post on the other board? IMHO probably not due to the nature of their business. However, SCE also owned shares which it earned for services provided. The philosophical question then is who has the "right" to post? Only those who bought shares? Only those who still owned shares? Only those who would prove up shares?

Right now, the investigation continues IMHO and we will eventually see who else may be charged, and who may be exonerated. I believe that is a logical assumption and opinion.

9 CKYS buys from October 13, 2006 to December 13, 2006. Still bagholding!

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.