InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 1614
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: iwfal post# 2246

Thursday, 03/15/2007 10:07:09 PM

Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:07:09 PM

Post# of 12660
OK, I grok what you mean on that first part. As for the second part of your post...

<<Agreed that while weight and LDH were stat sig in 9901 they were nowhere near stat sig in 9902a. But FWIW Location was also stat sig in 9901, but not in 9902a (although it was close). Strictly speaking they went from 5 stat sig covariates in 9901 to two in 9902a.>>

...actually, an argument could be made that p<0.10 could be considered stat sig in a Cox analysis (especially in a trial with only 98 pts), and disease localization was p=0.07. I could have sworn that they have designated PSA, bone mets, and disease localization as the three covariates to be used in 9902B's Cox.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.