Angel Acquistion (AGEL)

[shortfloat]

The price difference is most likely due to the market not understanding that ownership of PLMA is also ownership of BHWF. PLMA holders just got BHWF as a divi and will get more shares of BHWF every qtr. as a dividend. If Ironman held PLMA on the X-div date of the 6th, then he got shares of BHWF for free and will continue to recieve shares of BHWF every qtr paid as a dividend. The nice thing about getting the shares this way is the tax rate, he can sell BHWF without holding for the full yr. and still get the 15% rate of taxation. If he plans on holding PLMA long term, it is the one to own as other co's get spun off. This is per CEO...

- Shareholder value will be established by ownership of Palomar which in

turn, will lead to ownership in the publicly traded Subsidiary

Companies.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070226/lam006.html?.v=83

At this point, owning either co. will play out well in the long term as long as they can continue this rate of growth. After a few qtrs of proving this growth rate both co's will also get a high growth multiple. The risk can be high, but the reward in this type of incubator co is/can be the kinda thing that could make share holders wealthy. Traders that are aware of incubator co's look for just this sort of thing. All just my oppinion.