Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[jhalada]

Dan,

another notable quote from that article:
But I pressed High on what Intel would do if Opteron continues to get traction. Would Intel, as rumormongers continue to predict, possibly launch a second front in the 64-bit war and start selling a backward-compatible chip to compete with Opteron? (Intel supposedly has such a project, named "Yamhill.") "I can't say we're going to do it and I can't say we'll never do it," he replied. "If our customers say they want that kind of capability, we'll look at it."
http://www.fortune.com/fortune/fastforward/0,15704,545432,00.html
If you recall Intel 180 on Rambus, if was first that DDR was not on Intel's roadmap, to "If our customers say they want that kind of capability, we'll look at it.", to full fledged DDR support.

BTW, does anybody have a link to the recent Barrett's quote that sounded like a categorical denial (of Yamhill)?

Joe