InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 4930
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/12/2005

Re: None

Monday, 03/12/2007 11:40:41 PM

Monday, March 12, 2007 11:40:41 PM

Post# of 279080
Case Summary

Guess we'll be able to dig some more up on 05/03/2007....At least Frank is named. I see Mr. Fan is as well.

What the heck is "Does 1 to 100" named as a defendant mean?


Case Number: BC365909
STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER ET AL VS Q TELEVISION NETWORK INC E

Filing Date: 02/06/2007
Case Type: Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending

Future Hearings

05/03/2007 at 08:30 am in department 55 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Conference-Case Management

Documents Filed | Proceeding Information

Parties

DOES 1 TO 100 - Defendant/Respondent

FAN LLOYD - Defendant/Respondent

OLSEN FRANK - Defendant/Respondent's DBA

Q TELEVISION NEWORK INC. - Defendant/Respondent

STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF LA- - Plaintiff/Petitioner

STEVASON ANNE P. LAW OFFICES OF - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information

Please make a note of the Case Number.

Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

02/21/2007 Notice-Case Management Conference
Filed by Clerk

02/06/2007 Complaint

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.