InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1243
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/26/2002

Re: None

Tuesday, 11/18/2003 2:02:09 PM

Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:02:09 PM

Post# of 227
Posted by: the_worm06
In reply to: scu8452 who wrote msg# 109 Date:10/8/2002 7:38:09 PM
Post #of 218

SCU - "Fundamentally Sound"?


your post:

"Posted by: scu8452
In reply to: the_worm06 who wrote msg# 108 Date:10/8/2002 5:48:18 PM
Post #of 109

the_worm06

TVCP was no where as fundamentally sound
as YAK is, nor did they have the same customer base. Plus TVCP never had five consecutive quarters of profitability

(wink wink)

TVCP was a 'pet project' that never really took off!

It had good potential, but the market was not ready for Videophones. Even I knew that TVCP's stock would crash. That is why I sold when I did.

Good Luck"


----------

1. Yak is currently using a very expensive "Factor" for it's accounts receivable financing. Fundamentally sound companies do not use expensive Factors for their financing.

2. Yak was forced to "borrow" about $500,000 by using TVCP Toronto property as collateral. Fundamentally sound companies do not finance themselves in this way.

3. The Zwebner's, Charles and Michael, are involved with Yak. There are no entities that are "fundamentally sound" that have these two characters involved.

4. Alexander Walker's Nevada Agency & Trust is the transfer agent for Yak. It is currently being investigated by the SEC...this is public knowledge.


MY YAKC STOCK PRICE PROJECTION REMAINS:


FIVE CENTS


in six months



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.