Famlydog, I appreciate your sentiments, but I don't understand all of your logic. That I may have lost faith in this investment is true, but I don't see that it being an investment, not a life and death struggle, has anything to do with one's losing faith in the investment. Moveover, are you saying that it's not being a life and death struggle makes it an underdog or the fact that some have lost faith makes it an underdog. If you mean the latter, I don't think you are right.
What makes this company an underdog is that they haven't convinced any of those huge gorillas we used to talk about that it have a viable product. The one question asked over and over again on this board, and one question that carries its own logical weight, is if this company has the technology it says it has, why is it so difficult for them to get a loan. That this is a cutthroat world and that there may be companies out there wanting us to fail so they can pick up the pieces has been offered as a possible solution, and it is one that has some credence. But it's hard to imagine that none of the big money boys would be willing to invest in this sure thing if indeed it existed.
To suggest that posters who have lost faith in the company and criticize the company openly are even a partial cause in the lack of funding lacks even the vestiges of credibility in my opinion.
Might I point out that several months ago posters on this board offered an attempt at raising a million dollars on their own to offer it to the company with the stipulation that all of those monies would go for development and none for salaries. The company wasn't interested in even talking with us about that. Why?
Which leads to your last declaraion. They could have quit, but they didn't. There are being paid pretty well not to quit. But if and when the salaries dry up, I don't think it's a stretch to say they will quit.
Have a good Sunday.
