InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,554.25
(
0.20%
)
US TECH 100
18,971.20
(
-0.03%
)
Dow Jones
40,659.76
(
0.24%
)
Brent Oil
79.10
(
0.33%
)
Bitcoin
58,696.22
(
0.41%
)
Post# of 114953
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

4Godnwv

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 413
Posts 38418
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 08/07/2003

4Godnwv

Re: mikepgator post# 44920

Tuesday, 03/06/2007 5:16:36 PM

Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:16:36 PM

Post# of 114953
If the shorting is with 'real' shares reducing the float would indeed cause a scramble for cover. I agree a buy-back would be great.

The inference was that there were more shares in accounts than the amount printed. (think divvy) If that is the case, they can outprint ya.

I really have no way to intelligently comment on NSS - except to say if it is possible (and it is) someone will find a way to get away with it.

Again, doesn't matter what I think, MT is running the show.

ps - NSS might not even be the reason behind the reluctance to begin the buyback, just one possible scenario.


Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up