DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

work to P, Allow me a rebuttal. LOL

Frog has spent years fighting windmills, attempting to create the impression that DNAPrint's science is somehow second rate. Yet in the face of his twisted arguments stands the ever growing number of highly respected scientists working collaboratively with DNAPrint.

My friend, let us not forget your own contributions over the years. While I have attempted to have discussions about the actual science and intellectual property (mostly in vain), you have argued that there is no need to concern ourselves with science, we merely have to see what famous names may have, in fact, spoken to our scientists. One can only assume that you consider rubbing elbows with legitimate scientists and organizations is an equitable substitute for actually accomplishing anything.

When do you suppose they will turn their attention from embellishing their rolodex's and actually turn out a product?

I seem to remember you waxing ecstatic over those great scientists at NYU a half a decade ago and the legitimacy thus conferred on our little enterprise. Given your optimistic reviews, what is your impression of when that long ago venture will bear fruit?

Once you have established a prediction then maybe we can interpolate a date when we can expect results from this latest 'rubbing of elbows' with legitimate persons. lol

Do you think that at some time they will be able to take their acquired ligitimacy to Ebay and get some return for it? Nothing else seems to have any shot at near term income.

regards,
frog