Andy,
You used the word libellous. Do you even know what that means, legally?
Did BBB get warrants? Traunches? The PR said that warrants would be delivered, right? Why is it such a bigbad question to ask? After all, the company pR'd that it would happen, right? Isn't the company supposed to do what it said it would do?
The fact that you're so upset that I asked the question is revealing about your true view of how they operate. I suggest that they did what they said they were going to do, and you're incredulous, even calling me a criminal!
Let me ask you one question:
The past 3-5 days have been all full of the company PR's about how some private venture "struck natural gas"
do you think that the market is so dumb not to to recognize the true meaning/wealth inherent in these PR's? Or do you think that the naked shorters are killing the momentum again?
Why don't you read theone111 questions on RB and really ask yourself if there's no other answer than the one that's insinusated there?
Why would Jim Dial, if he were on the up and up NOT ALLOW THE TRANSFER AGENT TO ANWER MY DIRECT QUESTION TO THEM OH SO LONG AGO ABOUT HOW MANY SHARES WERE OUTSTANDING???
why would every PR now say things like "private venture" "not encumbering the assets of grifco"?
IMO it means that he is telling the world right up and up, that there's no attachment, not any relationship in the slightest between the grifco company (what the shahreholders own, by buyingGFCI ) and the assets or gas produced in those wells.
What does it tell you about the situation that every PR now says the same thing about the assets of GFCI?
IMO it's the most honest thing we've seen in PR's from JD yet...
You may e-mail me at spinedr@charter.net and I'll be happy to reveal to you who I am and what my position is.
thanks
