InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 153
Posts 39212
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 06/11/2001

Re: 100lbStriper post# 25324

Friday, 09/13/2024 5:00:15 PM

Friday, September 13, 2024 5:00:15 PM

Post# of 25766
Stokd $NLST Only manipulative FUD with an agenda the likes of Samsung would fail to acknowledge that when a case/trial is over and final judgment is issued, the matter is considered resolved/closed and treated as such by all judicial branches.

FILING AN APPEAL DOES NOT STOP OR DELAY THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER

Samsung can "claim" whatever they want—as we've seen through litigation—but the truth of the matter and reality is that all other litigation will proceed as though Samsung has no license until overturned or remanded by appeal court.

For all intents and purposes, if Scarsi denies JMOL and issues Final Judgment in BOC case, Samsung will be legally considered UNLICENSED going forward.

The distinction between BOC scenario and PTAB decisions on patent validity is that the PTAB is not part of the judicial branch and has no binding authority or preclusive effect over District Court unless affirmed by CAFC. In the non patent BOC case, final judgment stands till appeal court rules otherwise.
Bullish
Bullish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NLST News