InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: bag8ger post# 58249

Wednesday, 02/28/2007 2:28:34 PM

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:28:34 PM

Post# of 82595
Au Contrair!

With Merck involved--if it is?--I doubt there would be any announcement prior to a joint one, and that won't take place until all the i's are dotted and t's crossed.

Merck will run the release of news.


With Merck involved--if it is?--The pps of DNAG would be skyrocketing beyone even your imagination. There are hundreds of people involved in this project, no matter what rules of secrecy were imposed, with so many people there would be all manner of untraceable leaks. Wives, children, relatives, (their wives, children and relatives), friends, acquaintances, independent contractors (lawyers, accountants, etc). Second level connections, hairdressers, checkout clerks, taxi drivers, pizza deliverers etc.

These things are impossible to contain. They never have been and never will be containable.

The 'fact' that there has been no reaction, is a bankable indicator. There is no relationship. Regardless of who controls the PR strings.

regards,
frog