Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[chazzy1]

Hold everything! I think I see it. The following analysis is my best guess at what is happening. Notice, the judge did NOT say "case dismissed". He said "jury trial cancelled". This likely means that a trial by jury is no longer necessary to determine whether or not the defendants are guilty of infringement. The judge must be convinced of the guilt (or innocence) of the defendants, and thus sees no point in continuing with a jury trial. All we know for sure is that a jury trial is off the table. The judge could render a verdict in the absence of a jury. Also, I do not believe that a jury is necessary in order for the judge to impose treble damages. I think that the selling today was a kneejerk reaction by people who were reading a certain interpretation into today's information. It would be helpful if VP would put out an official explanation to clear the air. GLTA.