NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

$NLST Where I'm goin with "timing" in my previous post, during the claim 16/912 IPR, Netlist knew and included the fact that the "printed publication" issue is at the CAFC, and obviously prefers it comes at least prior our CAFC appeal oral argument. Any delays since, regardless how redundant—Dir Revw Rq—helped us with that.

VLSI has an appeal currently, where they asked CAFC to wait for Lynk Labs-Samsung ruling. Big implications for VLSI if CAFC rules for Lynk Labs, and does so prior to VLSI's CAFC conclusion.

"The Federal Circuit won't freeze an appeal of an administrative ruling invalidating a patent that a Texas jury said Intel infringed to the tune of $1.5 billion. That damages award to patent owner VLSI was vacated by the CAFC in a separate appeal in Dec 2023, but the court instructed a federal judge in Waco, Texas, to hold a fresh trial on damages. But if the validity decision from the PTAB is upheld on appeal before the damages trial reaches a final judgment, that would wipe..."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_578520028.png

https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/578520028