NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

$NLST Obviously we live in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty. What are the chances that Pitman denied NLST's motion to transfer from the WD to the ED due to his incompetence in not realizing that injunctive relief was requested by NLST.

There are 3 options here:

1. Pitman only read Micron's motion to deny the transfer and keep the case stayed pending IPRs and took everything Micron said for total facts (utter ignorance and gross negligence).

2. Pitman missed the part in NLST's motions where they did in-fact seek injunctive relief before making his ruling on the motion to deny (incompetence).

3. Pitman had interest in denying NLST their right to a timely justice by denying their motion to transfer the case or proceed with trial (malpractice, corrupt).

I would be very dissatisfied with anyone claiming that the WD docket is very heavy and they are too busy to read through all of the information before making a ruling on filed motions. There is no excuse.