InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 151
Posts 38619
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 06/11/2001

Re: 100lbStriper post# 24460

Thursday, 06/27/2024 3:58:34 PM

Thursday, June 27, 2024 3:58:34 PM

Post# of 24756
Stokd $NLST In Silvia's post of Micron's 10Q Patent Matters, when referring to our WD case/s — "Each complaint seeks injunctive relief" — Micron admits Netlist is seeking an injunction.

Yet "lack of injunctive relief" was the basis for Judge Pitman's denial of lifting the WD case stay.
"Specifically, the Court found that a stay would not unduly prejudice Netlist because it had delayed in serving Micron with its complaints and because, although Netlist has alleged that competes with Micron, Netlist has not requested injunctive relief from the Court."

And Micron contradicts its own 10Q—they can lie to Courts but not SEC.
"Micron argues that maintaining the stay would not unduly prejudice Netlist because Netlist has not requested injunctive relief in this case"
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_577941157.png

Pitman justifies his farce — "While competition between the parties can weigh in favor of finding undue prejudice, a party’s failure to request injunctive relief can indicate that the party is not unduly prejudiced by a stay of its case."
Bullish
Bullish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NLST News