InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2018

Re: Barron4664 post# 796661

Thursday, 06/27/2024 2:55:53 PM

Thursday, June 27, 2024 2:55:53 PM

Post# of 799305

Hey great comment thanks again. How is releasing the GSEs from conservatorship advocating for socialism? Hmmm. Also Treasury allegedly paid 1 billion for their equity of 1 million shares of senior preferred shares. The Jury already ruled on the LP as violating common law. Collecting the LP increased for free under the latest agreements would just trigger more of the same violations. Treasury received back all the money they loaned through the commitment thereby satisfying the requirement to protect the taxpayer. Calling the commitment dollar amount tacked on to the shares equity is just word play. I call it an illegal charge or fee attached to their 1 billion equity investment. If on the other hand Treasury bought 400 million shares of seniors your calling the outstanding LP equity might make sense. Thanks again for the comments.



It's not a loan and you ought to quit perpetuating this lie. What you're doing is what I'd call 'silent pumping'. I'm sure there are some naive people that read your comments and think you are right and every lawyer in all these lawsuits are idiots; the Collins decision means nothing; preferred equity is a loan and all this other nonsense you keep posting.

And they'll end up losing their butts because of it.