InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 59
Posts 5221
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/08/2012

Re: stockanalyze post# 796645

Thursday, 06/27/2024 11:51:52 AM

Thursday, June 27, 2024 11:51:52 AM

Post# of 799305
clayton
“Treasury cannot be accused of transferring any economic value to the “investors,” i.e. the owners of the pre-conservatorship common and preferred shares. Since those investors are now dominated by institutions, such as private equity or hedge funds, that purchased their shares at steep discounts after the two companies were placed in conservatorship, anything that looks like a windfall to them will be subject to substantial criticism by virtually every Democrat in Congress, and also probably many Republicans as well.”

replace pre-conservatorship with pre-nws and is a good compromise. i am personally good with pre-conservatorship too. but the investors who were part of rescue and invested in post conservatorship i.e. pre –nws should be rewarded as well. 19.9% of company should go them, only to them. imo. also need to include those who had to sell but bought pre nws on record.