Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[rapz]

HayDay,
Let the VPLM legal team pursue their IP rights allowed by the patent law US Code 35. The law does not discuss "what if" scenarios or alternatives. It is up to the Judge. VPLM can present a realistic damages estimate of REAONABLE ROYALTY FIGURES ALLOWED BY LAW.
Both sides have qualified attorneys who know what they are doing. VZ legal team better be prepared for the next RBR lawsuit coming shortly, again demanding willful infringement damages! The fast growing Fiber internet business and its module are covered by RBR claims.
It may not help defendants by bringing up the Alice issue even after it was shot down twice, once by Judge Brantley and next by the USPTO reexam office.
Be prepared to prove TO THE JURY, the infringement and demand enhanced damages and legal expenses for WILLFUL infringement just as Justice Roberts said.
The US patent law does not discuss "what if" scenarios. Justice Roberts statement on willful infringement was as simple as it can ever get. The jury's willful infringement verdict in VPLM's favor will be the icing on the cake. Investors ought to expect a tough fight, no settlement. Buyout is not in the cards. Is there any buyer?

We expect Appeals. Last time AMZN went for a writ of Mandamus Appeals to change the venue they were turned down, praising how well Judge Albright handled the venue issue.