InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 183
Posts 41507
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: ramalio post# 18467

Friday, 06/14/2024 6:35:14 PM

Friday, June 14, 2024 6:35:14 PM

Post# of 19345
This is from a very recent mine visit bulletin issued by BMXI for a visit between the dates of April 30, 2024 and May 7, 2024:

The reason for increasing the efficiency and production tonnage is due to the high grade of ore. Each individual 50kg ore bag from the
surveyed mining sites is showing assay results ranging from 1 gram to a high of 4 grams per bag. This equates 20 to 80 grams per
metric tonne (0.64 opt to 2.57 opt). and would be considered extremely high (anomalous) gold grades.



Do you see anything wrong with the math? Anything?

Nah, I bet you don't. Here's the big lie they just issued......

A bag of ore that has a grade of 1-4 g/ton Au does not "equate" to 20 to 80 g/ton Au. It equates to 1-4 g/ton. That bag of ore, no matter what it weighs, has a certain grade. Not sure why they don't have an actual grade, and instead give it a range, but we'll go with that. But here's the thing.....a larger bag of the same ore has the same grade. An even bigger bag of ore, has the same grade. A one-ton pile of the same ore has....wait for it....the same grade. There is no justification to multiplying by 20....none at all. Starting to get the picture?

The crazy high grades they reference in PRs are pure bullshit. And a deliberate lie. And their vaunted geologist should know better. Any mining professional using this kind of magical ore valuation would be fired, or sued, and would probably never work in the field again.

And what would an auditor say about such obviously flawed (and fraudulent) math?

Do your own research, use third-party sources, and don't buy into the hype.