Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[chazzy1]

Sunspotter, just because a patent owner does not produce any products (properly referred to as an NPE or non-producing entity), does NOT in and of itself make them a "patent troll," when DEFENDING their exclusive rights to ownership in a court of law, as you seem to suggest. Furthermore, the term, patent troll, carries a negative connotation, as if the patent owner is somehow the villain when defending his/her intellectual property rights against unlawful infringement. The law does not require the patent owner to produce a product as a condition of ownership.
And yes, the fact that you are here is none of my business, however, I have every right to question your motives for being here. Since, by your own admission, you are not, nor have you ever been, a VPLM shareholder, I have to wonder what purpose your presence here serves? Is your motive altruistic? That is, are you trying to save VPLM investors from themselves? If so, how is it that your due diligence and judgement are superior to all other VPLM investors? Do you have inside knowledge about the company? If so, it would be illegal for you to share it with us.
So yes, you have every right to be here, however, your motives are suspect. By the way, based upon your own statements, I think that your moniker could be improved slightly. How does "scamspotter" sound? It's just a friendly suggestion. 🙂