InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1430
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: None

Monday, 06/03/2024 5:12:34 PM

Monday, June 03, 2024 5:12:34 PM

Post# of 131270
The new lawsuits are for the new and/or previously untested claims on the RBR patent.

The recent Alice 101 decision in Huawei was in the case for the MG patents.

The 2 cases stand in their own. The original RBR cases were dismissed on 101 by an ignorant N CA judge & upheld as obvious by the Appellate court. The new RBR cases are in W TX.

The RBR has been successfully defended in IPR’s and came out of ex-parte re-exam stronger than it went in & added new claims.

Why do we think Alice 101 is off the table for the new RBR lawsuits when it was the MG patent that received the favorable 101 ruling in E TX? Did I miss a favorable 101 ruling by Albright in W TX on RBR?

I believe we come out of all the cases fine but something doesn’t make sense with some Alice comments.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News