InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 5236
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/08/2011

Re: cottonisking post# 111053

Thursday, 05/23/2024 6:23:58 AM

Thursday, May 23, 2024 6:23:58 AM

Post# of 111621
Enjoy the Hunt! Otherwise, close your eyes and wish for a rainbow or pie to fall out of the sky!

The crooks read and post on this board too! This case is much bigger than Lehman Brothers' derivatives. Shine a light on that coon that is trying to hide in that tall oak tree. 🤑

eargument or leave to appeal is therefore warranted.
Second, Supreme Court committed reversible legal error below, and this Court
erred on appeal, by misinterpreting the parties’ contract to allow a calculation of
Loss completely untethered to the market value of the terminated derivatives. AGFP
itself concedes that Supreme Court’s ruling finding market prices “irrelevant” was
based on “the language of the Agreement.” AGFP Opp. (NYSCEF No. 32) at 26. It Is axiomatic that “[t]he interpretation and construction of such documents as
contracts … are matters properly treated as questions of law and are reviewable by
this Court.” Gitelson v. Du Pont, 17 N.Y.2d 46, 48 (1966). In this case—😷where the
contract at issue governs hundreds of trillions of dollars of financial derivatives
between parties entirely remote from the parties in suit, 😷see JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. v. Godfrey Ltd. P’ship, No. 602920/2008, 2012 WL 10007863, at *9 (Sup. Ct.
N.Y. County July 16, 2012), there is a clear and significant public interest in ensuring
certainty and consistency in its interpretation and construction.
Supreme Court’s ruling that market prices were “irrelevant”





👁️ 👁️👌

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/DocumentList?docketId=nBhmPgrlziYnQ3JvgTtW2A==&display=all