SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[Kool Aid Man]

"Retaining an auditor" is a--(Newsflash)--classic scam tactic.

First, there's no way to independently verify the claim as the auditor typically won't confirm or deny.

Secondly, even if a letter "was" sent requesting an audit that doesn't mean a retainer fee was paid or that any documents were ever sent with which to audit. (I've seen such preliminary correspondence posted and used in such scams before).

Thirdly, as I understand it neither OTC Pink, OTCQB nor OTCQX require audits. Yet scam managements often promise audits as if that will magically enable them to leap frog right over the other two tiers and land smack dab on public exchanges like NASDAQ and NYSE.

In short....there's apparently ZERO need for any OTC turd to go thru the trouble and expense of an audit unless and until they're truly ready to make the massive leap to a public exchange like NASDAQ or NYSE.

Howzabout Park see if he can lift this turd from PINK/ "SHELL RISK" to OTCQB first then OTCQX???
More reality checks for yew knuckleheads https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/otc-markets-group-inc.asp

If Park has indeed "retained an auditor" AND paid them funds AND provided them with records and documentation to actually perform an independent audit AS IMPLIED then he should post the results anytime since Q2 is nearly 2/3rds over. He doesn't have to wait till the August 15th deadline to give some lame excuse why he hasn't.