Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[drumming4life]

Read the whole thing minutes after it hit the docket. It’s kind of ironic the whole reason this motion was filed is because the defendants are challenging the original damage expert VPLM used. Hudnell made both defendants aware of the new expert they want to substitute in filings more than a year ago.

I’m no legal expert but I it seems Albright isn’t going to allow the defendants to refute bringing in another damages expert since they are the ones requesting to exclude the testimony of the original expert. The plaintiffs have a right to present an expert with relevant expertise to explain technical issues to “lay” people (ie the jury) at trial or the plaintiffs will be adversely prejudiced…which could be a strong case for appeal if VPLM were to lose at trial.