NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

NLST PART-2 Then Samsung closed with the theme "what is more likely?"... that the narrative is as Netlist asserts or Samsung—supply limited and for joint development.

Netlist got a rebuttal closing where Sheasby took it to another level… just perfect! It was the rebuttal where he kept repeating loudly about crooked timber, how nefarious and devious Samsung was. Essentially showed them to be liars in business dealings and during this trial.

Few other interesting things:
-Sheasby said/showed that Samsung threatened to fire employees if they supplied Netlist, made them lie to Netlist.
-Netlist initially asked for 105 million.
-Samsung was threatened because it was infringing Netlist patents and wanted JDLA to avoid liability they claimed, needed the agreement for protection.
-methodically unpacked the case against Samsung and completely disproved their narrative.
-had Chuck and few other employees/witnesses stand up while Sheasby pointed out their contributions, sacrifices, and integrity.