InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: DaJester post# 793092

Tuesday, 05/14/2024 7:28:08 PM

Tuesday, May 14, 2024 7:28:08 PM

Post# of 795067

At no point did Treasury state they thought anything was illegal. Treasury is an entity, not a person. I've said this multiple times and I don't see you producing any evidence to the contrary.



Yes they did.

There had been some calls over the course of the conservatorship for Treasury to just forgive all or part of its claim. That was a nonstarter, politically, for Treasury. Moreover, Treasury claimed that it could not legally do so.



Mnuchin told this to Calabria directly, then Calabria recounted it in his book. That isn't hearsay, it's reporting.

Again, I've answered your questions multiple times. The answers are vague and not to your liking because I'm not Nostradamus.



No you haven't. You don't have to be Nostradamus to give answers to things like what specific claim would be filed (such as your assertion that the LP ratchet can be the basis of its own separate implied covenant claim), what court it would be filed in, and what the requested remedy would be.

This isn't all-or-nothing. You don't have to have all the answers in order to have any answers at all.

But you are also the pot calling the kettle black.



Wrong. Hypocrisy is telling someone to do something while not doing it oneself. Talk of new lawsuits with no intention of filing them is a perfect example.

Me pointing out that you have never given a common share price estimate is NOT hypocrisy because I actually did the work myself and published the results.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.

Posting about other posters is the last refuge of the incompetent.