RD. Here we go Again. I understand global business operations and the transactional variables of finance...
I see posts here in this forum that are pages long filled with calculations, projections and prognostications, yet when 2 or 3 relevant questions are asked you suggest that to provide what are surely known answers will bring "devastation and destruction". You suggest that meaningful and due communication is to be the downfall of the company. Simply, if the company will implode at the answering of three questions, then the company was not, and is not reliably functional... and if so, we would all be owed the knowledge of that fact as well.
This is the third time I've requested that you please do not offer a counter interjection when my communication is to Laxmi. Each of the other times you've replied that you don't recall interjecting.
You have had scores of aggressive verbal exchanges with Laxmi in this forum and I've never seen anyone interject and suggest you cease communications.
On the subject in point (payouts), you literally suggested to someone that they should take out loans to purchase vertical positions, yet after nearly six months of not receiving the backside of the agreement you offer a singular suggestion that Laxmi not communicate... I respectfully shake my head in disagreement as your suggestion has no basis in business operational norms... or in standards of leadership responsibility. Again, I think Laxmi is being an accountable leader by maintaining his presence here.
Please don't take my reply as offensive. It's simply a standard shareholder perspective and expectation.
Respectfully,
K
