InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 285
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/13/2023

Re: lflhdy post# 51370

Sunday, 05/12/2024 11:37:44 AM

Sunday, May 12, 2024 11:37:44 AM

Post# of 52287
I will also add, the car title analogy is flawed since a car only has one title. One person possesses one title. For a company, it's broken into multiple shares of capital stock. IQST will own 51% of those capital stock shares, Lynk Holdings will own 49% of the capital stock shares. So in court, it's not like arguing over who gets the 1 and only car title. It would be arguing over who gets how many of the shares of capital stock. Voyce wanting Link Holdings to give back their capital stock shares if they default is one thing. But Voyce wanting IQST to hand over their shares that they paid for in full is an entirely different scenario. That would be more like you buying a car from a dealership with cash, and say 6 months later a random bank calls and says the dealership didn't make their loan payments so they want you to hand over your car to them... You didn't borrow anything from that bank, and you didn't sign any agreements with them, the dealership did. So fuck that bank, they have no ground to stand on wanting anything from you.
There were no agreements between IQST and Voyce mentioned in the filing.

Again, not a financial advisor.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IQST News