InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 858
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/20/2019

Re: Saving Grace post# 8290

Tuesday, 05/07/2024 6:12:18 PM

Tuesday, May 07, 2024 6:12:18 PM

Post# of 8516
This is a terrible article, but it isn't all wrong.

First, the good. They are correct on the insider purchase. While insider purchases are often good news, they aren't always. In this case, it isn't negative, but it isn't as good as you make it out to be. Either way, I'll accept this as good news, as insider buying normally is. It's certainly a fair point, even if it is now old news.

The bad: the article speaks of revenue growth. This article, on that point, is stupid. Why do I say that? It looks like they just looked at the numbers reported in the 10-K, or on Yahoo or maybe their own site and reported the numbers. They clearly did not read the report, the 10-K, or the bankruptcy filings either. The fact is revenue declined to zero! That is $0.00. They make nothing, they have nothing in the pipeline and they are a shell. Investing.com did not do their research on this, so this article should NOT be relied upon. Again, the numbers are correct from a year to year basis, but that doesn't tell the actual story of bankruptcy, and the sell of of assets and becoming a shell company. They did have year over year growth in revenue, but they had a significant decline of revenue after Q2 to $0. You need a better source. Again, the article does report relatively (though now old news) of insider buying, but is misleading, and now essentially wrong on the revenue growth. The last point makes this wrong, or stupid as an article. I know you know these facts, but the article you shared does misrepresent the facts, at best.

However, to be fair, this doesn't rule out the company, through a merger or acquisition of some kind actually producing something and thus having revenue, but it hasn't happened yet, that I am aware of. The lawsuit with Foxconn resolution is months away, if not years away unless they settle, so that probably isn't the best place to look for near-term results for this company. The company, if it is smart, and if the new CEO and management are smart, should look elsewhere and not rely on winning this suit to move forward.