InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1022
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2019

Re: atom768 post# 20757

Monday, 05/06/2024 11:27:04 PM

Monday, May 06, 2024 11:27:04 PM

Post# of 20848
Good question, my thoughts are we need to look at the tax base, if done properly - without the money laundering aspect as a worry, then all 15 U.S. Departments, and the 151+ U.S. agencies would be offset by policy and in many respects a piece of this puzzle. Think about it, when was the last time so many agencies had a like type position? FDA- food, DoA- crop, All (every) law enforcement agency from common police through secret service (yes a money laundering agency, not just body guards-lol), DoD for vets, DoE, due to by product/fuel, clothing, medical....the list is huge, I read an article that showed 35 or 36 directly affected agencies, with something like 100+ with major minor touchpoints. One ring to bind them all-lol

Putting a policy together to justify all the different players is hard, and is not as simple as many are thinking it is. Remember gov agencies are VERY protective of their playing fields. Very.