InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2927
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: None

Friday, 05/03/2024 2:33:06 AM

Friday, May 03, 2024 2:33:06 AM

Post# of 794577
FnF calculate the capital metrics 'upside down', that is, they take a different concept (Net Worth or Equity) and subtract different items unrelated to the capital metric that you are calculating (SPS).
I already called the plaintiff Mr.Pro Se out, when he did the same 3 days ago, posting:
Net Worth
-SPS
-some portion of the DTA
= unaware that he was calculating Tier 1 Capital in his reply, and not the Core Capital that I was talking about with its statutory definition. He simply copy-pasted the script he had received beforehand.

This is Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae does the same:


Their objective was to conceal the components of each capital metric, so people don't see that FnF have $-84B Accumulated Deficit Retained Earnings account combined, shown on the Balance Sheets , but it's important to see it here as a component of the capital amount that later is required a minimum through regulation and statute ($-216B RE with the offset -Reduction of Retained Earnings- attached to the $132B SPS LP increased for free), an account tasked with absorbing future (unexpected) losses and a gauge of the rehabilitation in a financial company (RE is Core Capital for the capital ratios). Justice Alito's prerequisite to allow the Separate Account plan through restricted capital distributions: "Rehabilitate FnF in a way...".


This isn't a coincide. FnF calculated it correctly in early Conservatorship, and, for instance, this is how I learned that the Treasury Stock (stock buybacks) reduces the common stock par value when calculating the Core Capital.

FnF and this unsophisticated plaintiff, received instructions to change how to report the formulaic of the capital metrics.
Remember that Sandra Thompson arrived to FHFA in 2013 as Deputy Director, in charge of "overseeing regulatory policy, capital policy and financial analysis". Everything that is being put into question since long time ago (The Capital Reserve is what has to meet the capital requirements; SPS LP increased for free and its offset, are missing in the Balance Sheets; formulaic of the capital metrics, etc)
They all receive instructions from the same big players.
And who doesn't.