InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 19927
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2015

Re: boston745 post# 40914

Saturday, 04/27/2024 7:13:45 PM

Saturday, April 27, 2024 7:13:45 PM

Post# of 41033
This is what a scam looks like TA since you arent able to differentiate. Although i do believe there is a con going on here and that con is to convince people that Sintx's IP value isnt significantly more than it is. That management is more inept than it is. That Sintx isnt working with companies evidence clearly show its working with. This is why accounts like yours TA have to continually resort to deceptive tactics in their posts. The stockprice is clearly being manipulated to help drive these narratives and force those RS you like to point to. IF the stock price properly reflected Sintx IP value, in the hundreds of millions, Sintx wouldnt need to do as many offerings because it could raise more per offering, it wouldnt "print" as many shares, and wouldnt have needed to RS.

My stance on Tesla is its a bigger 'Fake it Until it Makes it Scam' than that of Theranos! A scam thats putting so many lives at risk!

Facebook Cofounder Says Tesla Has Committed "Consumer Fraud on a Massive Scale," Will End in Jail

Heads Will Roll

Amidst a chaotic month for Tesla — even by its continuously plunging standards — Facebook cofounder and multi-billionaire Dustin Moskovitz has made some pretty dire predictions for the automaker, accusing it of committing "consumer fraud on a massive scale."

"This is Enron now, folks," Moskovitz wrote on Threads, referring to the corporation that went bankrupt in 2001 after it was exposed for one of the biggest accounting frauds in history. "It may keep going, but people are going to jail at the end."


No idea about whether Tesla is engaged in book cooking, this is not the first time its been accused of that, but consumer fraud on a mass scale definitely seems accurate. Just look at what falls under fake it until you make it practice and then compare to actual actions taken by Elon Musk and Tesla.

it was arguably a referendum on “fake it till you make it” practices, such as intentionally overstating, and thereby misrepresenting, a fledgling company’s current capabilities, success, or profitability, while banking on the notion that its aspirations will eventually follow the desired trajectory and become a reality.



Elon Musk slashes price for Tesla’s vaunted self-driving tech by a full third—FSD now costs as much as in 2020

Rolled out to a select few three and a half years ago, the highly anticipated beta gave Musk the opportunity to hike the cost of FSD to $10,000. He would continue to urge his loyal customers to buy FSD, since the longer they waited, the more it would cost them.

That’s because Musk repeatedly claimed the price would go up the better the software got and the closer FSD came to driving without human supervision, at which point, he boasted, it would be worth over $100,000. Initially he also kept his word: Two subsequent hikes, which culminated in a record increase to $15,000 in 2022, were pushed through despite no substantive progress having been made.



The issue was that take rates had plummeted after customers broadly gave up on his annual promise of a breakthrough next year. He had to resort last month to compulsory trials when new owners picked up their car for the first time. Attempts to license the technology to rival carmakers also collapsed, he admitted in January.

In a way, Musk has given up on FSD as well. In what appears to be an acknowledgement that existing owners will not experience their cars turning into robo-taxis overnight—what Musk called Tesla’s “ChatGPT moment”—he opted to simply end the beta test in favor of calling the software “supervised FSD.” This opens up the chance to recognize nearly $926 million in deferred revenue


You can see clearly that Elon Musk has overstated what his tech could do and how quickly it could do it repeatedly. Not only that he also gave it enomous valuation saying FSD per vehicle would be worth 100k. This was crucial in Teslas valuation skyrocketing and helped propel sales of its vehicles well beyond what would have happened otherwise had these claims not been made.

Elon Musk’s Big Lie About Tesla Is Finally Exposed

Not long before the pandemic reared its ugly head, the brilliant, serial entrepreneur Elon Musk promised to roll out an Uber-like service enabled by self-driving Tesla vehicles. According to Musk, Tesla owners could expect to earn up to $30,000 per year in extra cash by lending their Teslas out to anyone in need of a ride. Owners and customers would transact on the “Tesla network.”

This self-driving technology already exists. At this point, the network can go live very soon, opening the world to an exciting new way to make money while you sleep.


Back in 2016, Elon Musk claimed that Tesla cars could “drive autonomously with greater safety than a person. Right now.” It was a lie, one that sent Tesla’s stock price soaring — and made Musk among the wealthiest people on the planet. That lie is now falling apart in the face of a new recall of 2 million Teslas. It’s also revealing to the broader public what close observers of Tesla have always known (and the company itself admits in the fine print of its legal agreements): Tesla’s so-called “self driving” technology works fine — as long as there’s a human behind the wheel, alert at all times.


By this time Musk had MCed numerous stock price-spiking hype events around the technology, and had been collecting deposits from customers since late 2016 for a “Full Self-Driving” version of the technology. Despite the reported deaths and clear evidence that the only video of a driverless Tesla was heavily staged, even Musk admits that his hype around self-driving technology has been the central factor in the recent growth of his wealth to titanic proportions.



Quote Sources:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-cofounder-says-tesla-committed-135001013.html
https://fortune.com/2024/04/22/elon-musk-tesla-price-cuts-earnings-fsd-supervised-full-self-driving-beta/
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/01/30/theranos-the-limits-of-the-fake-it-till-you-make-it-strategy/
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-commentary/elon-musk-tesla-crash-1234930544/

========================================

Silicon Nitride, a Close to Ideal Ceramic Material for Medical Application

examples of their medical applications that relate to spinal, orthopedic and dental implants, bone grafts and scaffolds, platforms for intelligent synthetic neural circuits, antibacterial and antiviral particles and coatings, optical biosensors, and nano-photonic waveguides for sophisticated medical diagnostic devices are all covered in the research reviewed herein. The examples provided convincingly show that silicon nitride is destined to become a leader to replace titanium and other entrenched biomaterials in many fields of medicine.


https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6131/4/2/16/htm

========================================

Silicon Nitride = Next Gen Hip Implant Material

Silicon nitride, silicon carbide and diamond-like carbon as non-oxide ceramics are considered to be the new generation of materials used in hip prosthetics, particularly in the manufacture of acetabular cups, due to their excellent biocompatibility, osteointegration, and tribological and mechanical properties, but all three materials need more study. However, silicon nitride is the nearest to commercialization, through businesses such as Amedica Corp. and SyntX Technologies


Im guessing the authors meant Sintx Technologies. Amedica being the companies former name before the name was sold to CTL.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422432/

========================================

Electromagnetic fields, metal implant corrosion, and dis-ease it causes


https://i.imgur.com/nLg7SXT.jpg

Cancer-Causing Effects of Orthopaedic Metal Implants in Total Hip Arthroplasty
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11011042/

Oral Cancer around Dental Implants: Are the Clinical Manifestations and the Oncogenic Mechanisms Unique?
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/79298

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172932779

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News