InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 182
Posts 41204
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: condor1 post# 105818

Saturday, 04/27/2024 2:52:05 PM

Saturday, April 27, 2024 2:52:05 PM

Post# of 106832
Then you deflect by suggesting that I DO SOME RESEARCH !!!!

LOL.... and that's exactly what you ended up doing. Good for you! Something you should have done a year or two years ago, or whenever it was that you handed over nearly six figures to these crooks at AABB.

And you seem convinced that AABB has the tailings issue taken care of, even though they have never once mentioned it in any of their promotions. And now you assume they will do dry stacked tailings.....even though, as you found out in your research, dry tailings methods have some serious downfalls. Far more expensive than liquid tailings management, and requires substantial upfront equipment costs, engineering, monitoring, etc. And creates a dust issue.....can you imagine the next door farmer's attitude when every time the wind blows, his crops get covered with toxic dust? Or are you still going with your "trucking it back up the mountain" theory?

And you seem to think that tailings ponds are "old technology" and nobody would use those methods anymore. Well, you provided multiple examples where tailings ponds are still used. It depends on the economics of the project, layout of the mine/processing area, the geochemistry of the tailings, water availability, hydrology (how shallow is groundwater), climate (how much rain falls in the rainy season), and many other factors.

You always assume that AABB "has it covered", and has done a tailings feasibility study, and will use the latest technology. You assume that idiotic animated mineral processing video is the exact layout that AABB will be using in their supposed processing facility. You know they ripped that animation off from some other company, and claimed it as theirs, right?

As far as acknowledging NOW that dry stacked tailings methods exist......you probably never noticed but I often referred to the tailings method/equipment as a "facility", sometimes as a "pond". Since the company had never mentioned or addressed the tailings issue, not even once, they left it up to investors and critics to figure it out. Investors were too ignorant to understand or care about the issue ("what? tailings are an issue?")

I made the judgement that dry tailings stacking, the most expensive and technologically advanced method of tailings management, was not worth mentioning in regards to a scam company with no proven assets, unaudited financials, no expertise or experience, with an ever-shrinking pile of waste rock on a hill that has been slowly trucked away over the last two years, and a processing plant that is not owned by them, or being built for them.

Do your own research, use third-party sources, and don't buy into the hype.