Talk about not being about to process things.
You have no idea what you’re talking about. You’ve never offered any substance with any of your posts. ZERO. All you want to do is attach anyone that doesn’t agree with you.
First of all, SHAREHOLDERS HAVE A RIGHT TO DAMAGES SOUGHT. DAMAGES ARE MATERIAL INFORMATION ESPECIALLY WHEN A COMPANY BASES ITS SOLE VALUE ON ENFORCEMENT. SHAREHOLDERS AND POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS NEED TO KNOW WHAT DAMAGES ARE BEING SOUGHT IN LITIGATION TO MAKE INVESTMENT DECISIONS.
Why in the world would VPLM agree to sign a NDA, to not disclose to the public the damages? Talk about caving. How about caving to Amazon in the first MG, case. BTW, regarding caving. I first was referring to your inept evaluation of VPLM’s patents, when you felt a measly $.20-.30 is an acceptable amount on a buyout. If one would process that, it would equate to an amount with just one case.
To accept a measly $.30 or even $.50 IMHO would be caving. Remember Emil has a few billion shares, how in the world is he going to sell all those shares? We’d all love a buyout with a reasonable fair PPS. Not so you with all your restricted shares, can liquidate as well.
As for when VPLM ran to $.30, $.40, “no damages estimated then”. REALLY, VPLM BLASTED A NUMBER OF TIMES TENS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN DAMAGES. I believe I even remember $102 billion total, if iI’m not mistaken. So, I call BULLSHIT on this.
Additionally, I’ve never mentioned anything regarding 10%.
Again, the PPS is falling and will keep falling IMHO. Eventually the PPS will rise as we get closer to trial before damages are announced. Gee, you’re really going out on a limb. Huh. Thus, far it’s falling and I anticipate it will continue . FACT.
IMHO
