Why didn't the SEC name or file a complaint against Calasse if he was guilty of fraud.
Why did the SEC make Sharp return the stock he stole from Calasse.
From the SEC comments on the Form 10.
"Organizational History, page 2
2. We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares. Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding.
Response: We have revised our disclosure to treat the Series A preferred issued to Warwick Calasse as issued and outstanding and to make clear that Mr. Sharp has retained control of Goff Corp. through the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred and 1,000,000 shares of common stock."
Sharp was busted for stealing the Calasse stock.
The SEC understood that GOFF was a puppet CEO for GOFF and never created or issued any press releases.
That is exactly why the SEC held harmless and didn't charge him with fraud.
You have used every excuse possible as to why the SEC never charged Calasse with securities fraud - one was hilarious - they didn't charge him with fraud because he didn't respond to a letter. That was hilarious but not close to being accurate.
Your obsession with Calasse is too funny - you still don't understand it doesn't matter who wins or losses - Sharp never had a company lined up and never will. The Calasse lawsuit has zero to do with Sharp halting all operations for GOFF/WNFT. Any competent CEO would have pushed forward.
Instead of tap dancing around the question - why didn't the SEC/DOJ file a complaint or indict Calasse for fraud.
Your obsession of Calasse - is delusional.
No real company will ever go public with a 3 time hijacked shell.
Why hasn't Sharp found a company for SRNW.
IG
The First Casualty of Emotion is Reason.
