Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

YUP

As I understand it ---- for purposes of the claims court and the case that went to SCOTUS (same or not?) ---- the thought process was something like --- NWS is so insanely obviously illegal - "on its face a taking" (all our equity profit?) --- that it was best to attack at what was viewed as the most vulnerable GOV action (BO starting the NWS - all profit) . We lost . Yet I am not sure there was no logic there at thinning the issue to one viewed by the plaintiffs and their attorneys as the most blatant clear illegal act

Others have argued for 5 10 ++ years they suits should have gone after HERA ---- I assume Charter Act and ... and

That is way beyond me --- . I see the logic of that!!!! I also see the logic of trying to slice off what was viewed as the most vulnerable action by GOV

Lawyers did not prove themselves right or particularly able? We suffered and they got paid