InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 13992
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/06/2006

Re: None

Tuesday, 04/23/2024 11:57:52 PM

Tuesday, April 23, 2024 11:57:52 PM

Post# of 56693
More LIES exposed. Thanks to poster AISI for posting more FACTS. If the authorities don't believe the lying grubs with a low IQ, nor do I.

Sano sneers that "anyone following this company & awake knows it was a pressure hydrostatic test that they also ran a current through. It wasn't operating with oil".... He goes on trying to further educate us all about how water is not that conductive and its use is a far cry from duplicating "field conditions".

The problem with this analysis is that OIL WAS USED in the hydrostatic test. The following is a quote from QS Energy:

After final assembly, on December 29th, the AOT was configured with a representative oil sample whilst maximum power was applied. Figure 2 shows the power supply at 40.2 kV during the test. While we expect to operate around 28 kV the additional voltage availability will allow us the flexibility of increasing the electric field if we have a desire or need to do so.

Bullish
Bullish