Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[Yolo]

You posted that Calasse's attorney and Sharp's attorney both stated that the district court found that Calasse "aided and abetted securities fraud," where only Calasse's attorney stated it which makes it even worse for Calasse since his own lawyer wrote it.

No, I didn't post that. Try reading it again, I'll help you (again, but for the last time) by swapping the order...

Sharp's attorney wrote (in the judgment he drafted for the judges signature, which was not approved by Calasse's attorney):

“only service was to aid and abet securities fraud”

Calasse's attorney wrote:

the district court found that Appellant’s “only service was to aid and abet securities fraud” and therefore cancelled Appellant’s Stock

So Calasse's attorney was quoting the district court judgment, which was written by Sharp's attorney and signed by Judge Williams. Can you understand this very basic concept now?