InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 1054
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/05/2020

Re: Smallville post# 21919

Monday, 04/22/2024 3:37:17 PM

Monday, April 22, 2024 3:37:17 PM

Post# of 21939
I still don't understand how it was an obvious scam. Even the CEO of Fluent said he didn't think Feldenkrais intentionally failed at growing hemp. There was nothing "cardboard cutout" about the operation. It was real with real components.

But Feldenkrais is a terrible business person with a sprinkle of shadiness thrown in. And, yes, I suppose he did deceive fluent with a few sleight of hands about his "operation." And the shareholders as well.

I don't think Feldenkrais scammed us. But I do think he fraudulently held himself out to be something it wasn't with Fluent. And he got busted for it.

I really believe that Fluent has the stronger position here. I want my money back but I would like to see Fluent win.

(1) Paragraph 4 in the Service Agreement states:Compensation and Terms: The contractor shall be paid for it's services on a per plant output basis. Output means produced. CIGN never produced a single, sell-able plant. How can you charge someone when nothing was ever produced?

(2) Contamination at the facility predates when Fluent was there. There is proof of COA's that have heavy metals in them from the hemp grown by Feldenkrais.

(3) Fluent was never truly in compliance with the Department of Health. The mortgage company prohibited the use of the facility as a medical marijuana grow operation. The contract with CIGN and the mortgage company would have made Fluent not in compliance for the growing of the plants. Fluent's lease agreement with CIGN should be voided as two lease agreements were in effect at the same time.

(4) Fluent CEO stated that he believed the hemp products he tested at the homestead facility were made from the hemp grown on site. He later learned that was not true. I believe him when he says this. I believe Feldenkrais used a sleight of hand to convince Fluent to use their facility.