Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[Yolo]

"Are you stupid or something?"

I thought we were on the same page. As I previously explained, the parties draft the proposed judgment and the judge approves. If there is a dispute and the parties can't agree on the judgment, they can both submit proposed judgments and the judge will choose one.

In this case, Sharp's attorney drafted a proposed judgment that goes well beyond what the judge actually said during the hearing. But the other attorney never replied, never approved or disapproved, and never submitted an alternative. So the district court entered the judgment drafted by Sharp's attorney without any input from Calasse's attorney.

Do you understand all that? You keeping up?

This is clearly Calasse's lawyer arguing (erroneously) that the cancelation of Calasse's stock "was improper." It was Calasse's lawyer who stated that the district court found that Appellant’s “only service was to aid and abet securities fraud” - not Sharp's lawyer as you falsely stated. It's just more of your willful disinfomation.

So... Since the judge entered the proposed judgment drafted by Sharp's attorney, it became the district courts decision. That is why any later reference mentions that "the district court found" or whatever, because they're appealing this decision. But the words were actually drafted by Sharp's attorney and should be given weight accordingly.

Going full circle, that's why I originally wrote:

The judge didn't write that, or conclude that. Sharp's attorney did, and the opposing attorney didn't rebut it in any way.

Which makes it meaningless.